Conversation
|
@neuecc With the removal of NB.GV, it's no longer clear to me which version |
neuecc
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Since there are no feeds being distributed, I don't think it's particularly problematic that the version is fixed.
What issues are you concerned about?
|
I like to know whether a branch will target 3.0, 3.1, or something else. Sometimes folks want to know what version (or at least what version band) will include the fix. And I find it useful sometimes when deciding whether a PR should target master or develop. |
|
Oh, it seems the branch management has been operating based on intuition/feeling, and nobody except you seems to understand those rules. |
|
@neuecc So is the idea at present the same as it was before, where |
|
For large-scale updates/refactoring, we might use the develop branch, but since we'll probably just have small fixes for a while, I think working with master branch only should be fine. |
|
Oh, another reason to know the version for a given branch is so I can pick the right milestone on the PR to record the version that will include it. At the moment, the milestones available are 3.0 and 3.1. |
Fixes #2121 (hopefully).