improve logging coverage during sarif upload#2221
Merged
Conversation
fccba0a to
6514cbb
Compare
henrymercer
reviewed
Apr 3, 2024
Contributor
henrymercer
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Thanks! A couple of suggestions:
Co-authored-by: Henry Mercer <henrymercer@github.com>
4b4826a to
2cc8bbd
Compare
angelapwen
approved these changes
Apr 4, 2024
This was referenced Apr 5, 2024
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
4 participants
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
This PR improves the coverage of logging when uploading SARIF files, in order to help catch where stalled action runs have encountered problems.
I've mostly added the log lines as
infosince this didn't seem excessively noisy, except for a few where the level isdebug.Does this seem a reasonable balance...? 🤷♂️
Merge / deployment checklist