crcmod is compiled C code and it should be optional. Is there a way to ask setuptools to try to install, but continue on if it fails?

It already handles that, via the following in its own setup.py:

try:
    setup(**setup_dict)
except KeyboardInterrupt:
    raise
except:
    # If there are any compilation errors or there are no build tools available
    # for the extension module, delete the extension module and try to install
    # the pure Python version.
    del setup_dict['ext_modules']
    setup(**setup_dict)

Note that crcmod doesn't explicitly support Python 3.3 or 3.4.

D'oh! My bad for not checking. Great news though.

RE: Python 3.3/3.4 support

• the module has not been updated since 2010
• there is a gsutil mirror since the ship it in their binary
• there is a somewhat official repo that was created in 2012, but commits still stop in 2010 (it doesn't look like the author "Ray Buvel" is in any of the commits)

I don't know if there is a formal way to "refresh" the package that is 4+ years old.

Coverage decreased (-0.06%) to 99.94% when pulling 48e1e0a on dhermes:add-crc32c-check into 83f92cc on GoogleCloudPlatform:master.

Running the generator is not so helpful:
https://gist.github.com/dhermes/1cecf85c706ef8491c9a

One of the biggest perks is the .update() and .hexdigest() interface of the Python interface.

Because crcmod is an "optional" dependency (conditionally imported, with an exception raised at the one point it is needed if it is not present), we should declare it via an "extra" in setup.py, e.g.:

setup(
    name='gcloud',
    ...
    extras_require={
        'storage_checksum': ['crcmod'],
    },

It needs to be in tox.ini as well.

@tseaver We need to determine what to do about Python 3 compatibility before moving too far forward.

It seems relying on this library from PyPI is not possible in the current state.

We could fork it to https://github.com/GoogleCloudPlatform/gcloud-python, I guess, and ensure that its tests support the versions we care about.

@cmcqueen Do you have any contact with the maintainers of crcmod? (I am inquiring due to your fork: https://bitbucket.org/cmcqueen1975/crcmod)

I have had contact in the past, though that was several years ago (I contributed some changes to crcmod). I could look up my old e-mail correspondence.

Thanks for the quick reply! That would be great. We essentially just want to get Python 3.3. and Python 3.4 supported in the library without forking it. I don't know what happens to abandoned PyPI packages, but it seems something like crcmod2 might be necessary.

I reached out today to Ray Buvel (the author) via the SourceForge message UI

Thanks @tseaver. Maybe we could file an issue with https://github.com/pypa/pip or reach out to https://groups.google.com/forum/#!forum/pypa-dev (Python Packaging Authority).

What is needed for 3.3 and 3.4 support? Do you mean just compile Windows binaries? I compiled the old ones I think, but only for 32-bit not 64-bit.

(I wish the Python foundation provided a service to compile Windows binaries for Python packages, since it's difficult to get set up to compile them, for both 32-bit and 64-bit. It would be really helpful.)

There is this unofficial repository of Python binary packages, including crcmod

@cmcqueen Yes, we'd like to have Windows users able to use gcloud and its dependencies on the Python versions we support, without needing to be able to build extensions. I found an explicit e-mail address today for Ray Buvel, and tried again (on the theory that the SF.net profile might have an out-of-date address).

@tseaver Did you ever hear from Ray Buvel?

@tseaver Did you ever hear from Ray Buvel?

@dhermes Nope, crickets.

Declaring bankruptcy on this PR, which is two years old and no activity for 18 months.

@frankyn This is the ticket for our never-merged CRC32C support.

Thank you @tseaver!

crcmod is effectively abandoned (last release more than eight years ago). We might do better to use crccheck, which is pure Python, and supports modern Python versions (it is GPL v3, though).

So the open question is we need to define a package to use for crc32c checksum support?

@frankyn Yes.