Using 'fields' in Bucket.exists().#720
Merged
dhermes merged 1 commit intogoogleapis:masterfrom Mar 13, 2015
Merged
Conversation
This decouples Bucket.exists() from Connection.get_bucket(). Relevant to googleapis#632.
Contributor
|
LGTM |
dhermes
added a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Mar 13, 2015
Using 'fields' in Bucket.exists().
parthea
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Sep 18, 2025
This prepares the way for using the `query_and_wait` method built-in to the client library when available. Thank you for opening a Pull Request! Before submitting your PR, there are a few things you can do to make sure it goes smoothly: - [ ] Make sure to open an issue as a [bug/issue](https://togithub.com/googleapis/python-bigquery-pandas/issues/new/choose) before writing your code! That way we can discuss the change, evaluate designs, and agree on the general idea - [ ] Ensure the tests and linter pass - [ ] Code coverage does not decrease (if any source code was changed) - [ ] Appropriate docs were updated (if necessary) Towards #710 🦕
parthea
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Nov 22, 2025
parthea
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Nov 24, 2025
Co-authored-by: release-please[bot] <55107282+release-please[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>
parthea
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Nov 25, 2025
Co-authored-by: release-please[bot] <55107282+release-please[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>
parthea
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Feb 13, 2026
Removing @googleapis/api-logging, @googleapis/api-logging-partners, and @googleapis/api-logging-reviewers. Replaced with @googleapis/yoshi-python in metadata and blunderbuss. b/476446922
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
4 participants
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
This decouples Bucket.exists() from Connection.get_bucket().
@tseaver This came up when I was to removing
Connection.get_bucket(). I opted to just useconnection.api_requestinstead of dealing with the potential cycle caused by importingstorage.apianywhere but__init__.As it turns out (as I mention in #632), this is a way to reduce the response payload for checking existence (unfortunately, the headers still are overwhelmingly verbose).