Add support for GHC 9.6 and GHC 9.8#130
Conversation
|
The GHC 9.8 support is blocked on: The rest looks fine. Do note that the mtl bump requires a code change so not all of this is just bounds stuff |
c8d6bf1 to
8846508
Compare
|
This should be good now. I don't have the permissions I think to rerun CI |
|
Me neither. Could you maybe rebase and push? |
|
I've pushed an empty commit and I'll drop it once CI has run, since this is already up-to-date with master |
|
Huh I guess Windows and Mac are broken? They seem to lack the C libs |
the former is deprecated
ab51e52 to
dc2e3e3
Compare
|
I've managed to get one of the MacOS jobs to pass at least but no luck with the rest. Could we merge this @Mikolaj and handle the rest later? Btw if you need a hand maintaining this repo and |
Makes sense. Anybody: any objections?
Oh, that would be great. I'm not the maintainer myself, I'm merely helping @maoe, who is currently busy, while the real maintainer, as you can see in the .cabal file, is @simonmar, whom I'd normally ask to extend the Hackage maintainers list on Hackage for Threadscope and ghc-events and to give any extra github permissions. |
|
I've heard no objections, so let me merge. |
This build upon #129 to add support for 9.6 and 9.8 as well.