Skip to content

Conversation

@olaservo
Copy link
Member

@olaservo olaservo commented Jan 17, 2026

Summary

Note: This PR converts John McBride's original SEP proposal (PR #881) from issue #834 to the new SEP format established by SEP-1850. The original proposal and community discussion remain in PR #881—this PR formalizes it under the new process with a reference implementation.


  • inputSchema: Keep type: "object" required (since tool arguments are objects), but allow any additional JSON Schema properties to support composition keywords (anyOf, oneOf, allOf, etc.)
  • outputSchema: Fully support JSON Schema 2020-12 (arrays, primitives, objects, compositions)
  • structuredContent: Accept any JSON value validated by outputSchema
  • Include reference implementations: TypeScript SDK fork and demo server with example tools

Motivation

The current MCP specification restricts tool schemas in ways that conflict with full JSON Schema support and create real friction in the ecosystem.

The Problem: A weather API tool that returns hourly forecasts cannot return the natural response:

[
  { "hour": "09:00", "temp": 68, "conditions": "sunny" },
  { "hour": "10:00", "temp": 72, "conditions": "partly cloudy" }
]

Instead, developers must wrap arrays in unnecessary container objects—conflicting with common REST API patterns (GitHub Events API, AccuWeather, standard collection endpoints).

SDK Evidence: This isn't theoretical friction. FastMCP, one of the most popular Python SDKs, has implemented extensive workarounds with error messages that explicitly cite "MCP spec limitations." These workarounds have caused real bugs:

  • Issue #2455: $ref schemas without type: object broke ALL tools on a server
  • Issue #2421: Unexpected {"result": ...} wrapping confused users

Industry Precedent: OpenAPI went through this same evolution. OpenAPI 3.0's "extended subset" of JSON Schema caused years of tooling confusion. OpenAPI 3.1 made the strategic decision to fully align with JSON Schema 2020-12—MCP can learn from this rather than repeating the same journey.

Backward Compatible: All existing schemas continue to work. No migration required.

Related issue: #834
Original proposal: #881

Reference Implementation

Testing

Reference implementation tested with demo tools demonstrating:

  • get-weather-forecast: Raw array output (matches SEP motivation example)
  • get-count: Raw primitive output
  • find-by-id-or-name: Flexible input patterns using oneOf with type: "object"

AI disclosure

This PR was written with assistance from Claude. The SEP content, reference implementations, and rationale were developed collaboratively.

@olaservo olaservo added the SEP label Jan 17, 2026
@olaservo olaservo self-assigned this Jan 17, 2026
@olaservo olaservo added the draft SEP proposal with a sponsor. label Jan 17, 2026
@olaservo olaservo force-pushed the sep-834-json-schema-2020-12 branch from 876b01c to 0d23ecc Compare January 17, 2026 21:55
olaservo and others added 9 commits January 17, 2026 15:50
Add SEP proposing to loosen inputSchema, outputSchema, and
structuredContent restrictions to enable full JSON Schema 2020-12
compliance. This allows array responses and schema composition
keywords (anyOf, oneOf, allOf).

Relates to modelcontextprotocol#834

Co-Authored-By: John McBride <jpmmcbride@gmail.com>
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
… support

- inputSchema: Allow any valid JSON Schema (enables oneOf/anyOf/allOf at root)
- outputSchema: Allow any valid JSON Schema (enables array schemas)
- structuredContent: Allow any JSON value (enables array responses)
- Update tools.mdx documentation
- Add example files demonstrating new capabilities

Reference: modelcontextprotocol#834

Co-Authored-By: John McBride <jpmmcbride@gmail.com>
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
- Updated inputSchema spec to allow any valid JSON Schema (full 2020-12 compliance)
- Replaced get-array-content with get-weather-forecast tool
- Weather forecast matches the exact example from Motivation section
- Updated npm package references to latest versions:
  - SDK: @olaservo/mcp-sdk@1.25.2-sep834.3
  - Server: @olaservo/mcp-server-everything-sep834@1.1.0

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
- Renamed 0000-json-schema-2020-12.md to 2106-json-schema-2020-12.md
- Updated SEP number to 2106
- Updated PR link to modelcontextprotocol#2106

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
@olaservo olaservo force-pushed the sep-834-json-schema-2020-12 branch from 9eb42d9 to 7250539 Compare January 17, 2026 22:51
- Update title to match original: "Tools inputSchema & outputSchema Conform to JSON Schema 2020-12"
- inputSchema: Keep type: "object" required, but allow additional JSON Schema properties
- outputSchema: Fully flexible (any valid JSON Schema)
- structuredContent: Any JSON value (unknown)
- Update examples to show composition with type: "object"

Co-Authored-By: John McBride <jpmmcbride@gmail.com>
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
@olaservo olaservo changed the title SEP: Full JSON Schema 2020-12 Support for Tool Schemas SEP-2106: Tools inputSchema & outputSchema Conform to JSON Schema 2020-12 Jan 17, 2026
olaservo and others added 3 commits January 17, 2026 16:09
Aligns schema.ts with John's original PR modelcontextprotocol#881:
- inputSchema: Keep type: "object" required, allow additional properties
- outputSchema: Any valid JSON Schema (with $schema field)
- Regenerate schema.json and schema.mdx

Co-Authored-By: John McBride <jpmmcbride@gmail.com>
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
@sep-automation-bot
Copy link

Maintainer Activity Check

Hi @olaservo!

You're assigned to this SEP but there hasn't been any activity from you in 14 days.

Please provide an update on:

  • Current status of your review/work
  • Any blockers or concerns
  • Expected timeline for next steps

If you're no longer able to sponsor this SEP, please let us know so we can find another maintainer.


This is an automated message from the SEP lifecycle bot.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

draft SEP proposal with a sponsor. SEP

Projects

Status: Draft

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants