Conversation
Co-authored-by: Aaron Parecki <aaron@parecki.com>
| [RFC 8707 Section 2](https://www.rfc-editor.org/rfc/rfc8707.html#section-2) and aligns with the `resource` parameter in | ||
| [RFC 9728](https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/rfc9728). This URI: | ||
|
|
||
| 1. **MUST** be an absolute URI, as specified by [Section 4.3 of RFC 3986](https://www.rfc-editor.org/rfc/rfc3986#section-4.3). |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Do we need to list these or should we just refer to RFC 8707.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
@dsp-ant IMO these are helpful to list explicitly as guidance for implementers.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
I find the examples useful, this list slightly less so since I ended up bringing up 8707 to see if there was a diff. I'm inclined to remove it to keep it brief.
pcarleton
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
overall lgtm.
left a few optional tweaks.
| [RFC 8707 Section 2](https://www.rfc-editor.org/rfc/rfc8707.html#section-2) and aligns with the `resource` parameter in | ||
| [RFC 9728](https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/rfc9728). This URI: | ||
|
|
||
| 1. **MUST** be an absolute URI, as specified by [Section 4.3 of RFC 3986](https://www.rfc-editor.org/rfc/rfc3986#section-4.3). |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
I find the examples useful, this list slightly less so since I ended up bringing up 8707 to see if there was a diff. I'm inclined to remove it to keep it brief.
| - `https://mcp.example.com` | ||
| - `https://mcp.example.com:8443` | ||
| - `https://mcp.example.com/server` (when path component is necessary to identify individual MCP server) |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
| - `https://mcp.example.com` | |
| - `https://mcp.example.com:8443` | |
| - `https://mcp.example.com/server` (when path component is necessary to identify individual MCP server) | |
| - `https://mcp.example.com/mcp` | |
| - `https://mcp.example.com` | |
| - `https://mcp.example.com:8443` | |
| - `https://mcp.example.com/server/mcp` (when path component is necessary to identify individual MCP server) |
wydt about this? I want to make it clear that passing the "server URL" is completely valid, like the one people would likely pass into a client.
|
Requiring the client to pass the See #284 (comment)) and oauth-wg/oauth-v2-1#215 |
Related to #544