Skip to content

Conversation

@johnandersen777
Copy link

@johnandersen777 johnandersen777 commented Feb 28, 2018

@the-knights-who-say-ni
Copy link

Hello, and thanks for your contribution!

I'm a bot set up to make sure that the project can legally accept your contribution by verifying you have signed the PSF contributor agreement (CLA).

Unfortunately our records indicate you have not signed the CLA. For legal reasons we need you to sign this before we can look at your contribution. Please follow the steps outlined in the CPython devguide to rectify this issue.

Thanks again to your contribution and we look forward to looking at it!

Copy link
Member

@1st1 1st1 left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

This needs more discussion in https://bugs.python.org/issue32972

@bedevere-bot
Copy link

A Python core developer has requested some changes be made to your pull request before we can consider merging it. If you could please address their requests along with any other requests in other reviews from core developers that would be appreciated.

Once you have made the requested changes, please leave a comment on this pull request containing the phrase I have made the requested changes; please review again. I will then notify any core developers who have left a review that you're ready for them to take another look at this pull request.

Signed-off-by: John Andersen <john.s.andersen@intel.com>
def runMethod(cls, meth):
"""Executes a function or coroutine function using the
coroutineRunner."""
if inspect.iscoroutinefunction(meth):
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

This does not work if the method is decorated with @unittest.mock.patch.

Copy link
Contributor

@PetterS PetterS left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

n/a

@ned-deily
Copy link
Member

@pdxjohnny Sorry that the discussion about this issue has languished, especially since the submitting of an alternate PR. However, I see your PR was created against the 3.6 branch; for enhancements, we require that PRs be against the "master" branch. So I'm going to close this PR and you can decide how you want to proceed, either submitting an updated PR against "master" or perhaps commenting on the other open PR. In any case, thanks for getting the discussion started and submitting this PR!

https://devguide.python.org/pullrequest/

@ned-deily ned-deily closed this Jun 7, 2018
@johnandersen777
Copy link
Author

johnandersen777 commented Jun 7, 2018 via email

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

7 participants