Merged
Conversation
Member
|
@Bibo-Joshi And we should check search |
Member
Author
|
Both search and rulesbot-search (which are basically the same thing, IG) seem to work fine :) |
harshil21
reviewed
Jan 5, 2023
Member
harshil21
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Do we want to drop the prefixes even for the modules?
Member
Author
For |
Member
|
@Bibo-Joshi yes |
Poolitzer
approved these changes
Jan 6, 2023
Member
Poolitzer
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Yes, thank you, looks perfect.
harshil21
approved these changes
Jan 9, 2023
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in.
3 participants
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
As suggested in https://t.me/c/1494805131/32127. Build will be up soonish on rtd.
URLs seem to be unchanged.
Before a merge, I want to test if this would imply any changes for rulesbot.