Use HTTP server for TUF conformance testing#1045
Conversation
52c7a19 to
e109a4e
Compare
30ed39b to
981e60a
Compare
|
btw, is it possible to increase the verbosity of the client code somehow? Doesn't have to be a CLI flag or anything if that's complicated, a code change is fine, but would be useful to be able to see a little more of the client decisions... |
|
We don't really have much logging. But what are you looking for? |
was just interested to see what sort of decisions the client is making in general -- e.g. was interested in but if there's no logging like that then I know I'll have have to add some if I really want to know. |
|
there is some issue with the stream redirection:
What I imagine might happen (caveat: I barely read java):
This might not be important enough to fix considering what Appu said -- there's not much logging in the code. |
|
yeah I think we could run the server in a mode which tees the output to stdout/err as well as returning it to the conformance suite. So if someone happened to be testing locally running the server in a different terminal than the tests, then we'd be okay. |
7a6046b to
93f902f
Compare
296b58e to
0313c41
Compare
Signed-off-by: Aaron Lew <64337293+aaronlew02@users.noreply.github.com>
0313c41 to
401e4d7
Compare
|
lets merge this for now, but I'd like to find a way to only keep one xfails file. So lets open an issue or update the build immediate after this. |
Use HTTP server for TUF conformance testing Signed-off-by: Aaron Lew <64337293+aaronlew02@users.noreply.github.com>
Summary
This change speeds up TUF conformance testing by using an HTTP server.