WIP Draft: Validating that mattsu2020 approach to pipes works with all pipe tests#9646
Closed
ChrisDryden wants to merge 2 commits intouutils:mainfrom
Closed
WIP Draft: Validating that mattsu2020 approach to pipes works with all pipe tests#9646ChrisDryden wants to merge 2 commits intouutils:mainfrom
ChrisDryden wants to merge 2 commits intouutils:mainfrom
Conversation
b2e75a8 to
696bffb
Compare
|
GNU testsuite comparison: |
b1f259d to
c8e1c48
Compare
…with all signal tests
c8e1c48 to
060fba1
Compare
CodSpeed Performance ReportMerging #9646 will degrade performances by 2.54%Comparing Summary
Benchmarks breakdown
Footnotes
|
|
GNU testsuite comparison: |
This was referenced Dec 14, 2025
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
2 participants
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Not for review just for discussion and validation of pipeline handler approach
I took the change that mattsu2020 made to be able to track the pipe signals and just did some messing around to see if that approach could work for all of the pipe related tests. Will use this for inspiration to make PR's for each one individually. I found that some of the original changes didn't work and that the other GNU tests have different expectations for how seq fails