GNU testsuite comparison:

Note: The gnu test tests/tail/inotify-dir-recreate is now being skipped but was previously passing.

not sure i see the difference between false and removing them

Like https://github.com/uutils/coreutils/actions/runs/20464039880/job/58803258630?pr=9796#step:11:262 .
This is not existing at main branch.

GNU testsuite comparison:

GNU test failed: tests/tty/tty-eof. tests/tty/tty-eof is passing on 'main'. Maybe you have to rebase?

GNU testsuite comparison:

GNU test failed: tests/cp/no-ctx. tests/cp/no-ctx is passing on 'main'. Maybe you have to rebase?
Note: The gnu test tests/csplit/csplit-heap is now being skipped but was previously passing.
Note: The gnu test tests/printf/printf-surprise is now being skipped but was previously passing.
Note: The gnu test tests/rm/many-dir-entries-vs-OOM is now being skipped but was previously passing.

GNU testsuite comparison:

GNU test failed: tests/cp/no-ctx. tests/cp/no-ctx is passing on 'main'. Maybe you have to rebase?
Note: The gnu test tests/csplit/csplit-heap is now being skipped but was previously passing.
Note: The gnu test tests/printf/printf-surprise is now being skipped but was previously passing.
Note: The gnu test tests/rm/many-dir-entries-vs-OOM is now being skipped but was previously passing.

i guess it is unexpected, no ?

I will revert no-ctx after CI's traffic jam was solved.

CodSpeed Performance Report

Merging this PR will not alter performance

_{Comparing oech3:patch-2 (ff87f56) with main (40e50ba)}

Summary

✅ 141 untouched benchmarks
⏩ 38 skipped benchmarks¹

GNU testsuite comparison:

Skip an intermittent issue tests/tty/tty-eof (fails in this run but passes in the 'main' branch)
Note: The gnu test tests/tail/tail-n0f is now being skipped but was previously passing.

How about simply enabling those tests?

Conflicts with #10305